Showing 65 posts in Discovery.
Court Sanctions Counsel Under R.11 & R.37 For Inexcusable Violations
Heinrich Beck v. Atlantic Coast PLC., et al., C.A. No. 303-N, (Del. Ch. Feb. 11, 2005)(published at 868 A.2d 840 (Del. Ch. 2005)). This opinion deals with attorney sanctions under Court of Chancery Rules 11 and 37. More › SharePlaintiff Loses Motion To Dismiss For Lack Of Jurisdiction
Posted In Discovery, Jurisdiction
American Scheduling, Inc. v. Radiant Systems, Inc., C.A. No. 725-N, 2005 WL 736889 (Del. Ch. Feb. 09, 2005).
This is a motion to quash jurisdictional discovery. The court granted the motion, quashing the discovery. More ›
Share
Court of Chancery Stays Discovery Applying The "Special Circumstances" Test
George D. Orloff, et al. v. Lloyd J. Shulman, et al., C.A. No. 852-N, 2005 WL 333240 (Del. Ch. Feb. 02, 2005). Minority shareholders of LLC brought a derivative suit for corporate waste and breach of fiduciary duties. Defendants filed a motion to stay discovery pending the resolution of a motion to dismiss. The court granted it. More › ShareCourt of Chancery Permits Privileged Documents For "Good Cause" Under "Mutuality of Interest" Exception
Posted In Discovery, Fiduciary Duty
In re Freeport-McMoran Sulphur, Inc. Shareholder Litig., C.A. No. 16729, 2005 WL 225040 (Del. Ch. Jan. 26, 2005).
This discovery-related action involves a claim of access to defendant-corporation's documents listed in its privilege log through a motion to compel. The court granted the motion in part, but denied production of the shareholder repurchase document. More ›
Share
Federal Court Denies Defendant's Motions Including Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6)
Posted In Discovery
Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Household Intern., Inc., No. Civ. A. 02-1328 JJF, 2005 WL 23351 (D.Del. Jan. 5, 2005), aff'd, 167 Fed.Appx. 895 (3d Cir. 2006).
In this opinion the Court considered: (1) Plaintiff's Motion For Protective Order; (2) Defendants' Motion To Compel Discovery Relating To Financial Institutions Endorsement; (3) Defendants' Motion To Compel Deposition Of Westchester's Corporate Representative Witness; and (4) Defendants' Motion To Compel Discovery Relating To Westchester's Denials And Defenses.
The Court denied all of defendants motions and held plaintiff's motion moot. More ›
Share