Showing 590 posts in
Case Summaries.
By Morris James LLP on September 20, 2005
Bonham v. HBW Holdings, Inc., C.A. No. 820-N, 2005 WL 2335464 (Del. Ch. Sept. 20, 2005).
Defendants moved to stay discovery pending resolution of their motion to dismiss.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on September 20, 2005
Flight Options Int'l, Inc. v. Flight Options, LLC, C.A. No. 1459-N, 2005 WL 2335353 (Del. Ch. Sept. 20, 2005).
Plaintiff sought preliminary injunction against consummation of Purchase Agreement pending arbitration of its substantive disputes with Defendant.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on September 16, 2005
Worldspan, L.P. v. The Ultimate Living Group, LLC, 390 F.Supp.2d 412 (D.Del., 2005).
United States District Court for the District of Delaware considered a motion to dismiss a claim alleging breach of a maritime contract for a one-day charter of a motor yacht, unjust enrichment, conversion and a violation of Delaware's Deceptive Trade Practices Act ("DPTA").
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on September 15, 2005
Federal Ins. Co. v. Lighthouse Constr., Inc., 230 F.R.D. 387 (D.Del. 2005).
A subrogation action was brought by a property insurer to recover for loss incurred by a roof collapse against a building contractor. The contractor sought leave of the Court to file a third-party complaint against the erection contractor. The insurer also sought leave to file a claim against the erection contractor.
The Court held that the contractor could file a third-party claim for indemnity against the erection contractor. However, the Court also ruled that the plaintiff-insurer was barred by a two-year statute of limitations from filing a third-party claim against the erection contractor.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on September 14, 2005
FGC Holdings Ltd. v. Teltronics, Inc., C.A. No. 883-N, 2005 WL 2334357 (Del. Ch. Sept. 14, 2005).
Plaintiff FGC Holdings Limited, owner of Series B Preferred Convertible Stock in Defendant Teltronics, Inc. sought declaratory judgment that its Series B Director designee had an immediate right to sit on Teltronics' board of directors.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on September 13, 2005
VFB LLC v. Campbell Soup Co., 2005 WL 2234606 (D.Del., September 13, 2005). Plaintiff brought an action alleging that Defendant engineered a fraudulent transfer of over $600 million from Plaintiff's predecessor in interest, Vlasic Foods International, Inc., ("VFI"), to Defendant, that Defendant controlled VFI's directors and caused them to breach their fiduciary duties, that VFI paid illegal dividends to Defendant, that Defendant was VFI's alter ego, and that Defendant's Proof of Claim against VFI's bankruptcy estate was either voidable or should be equitably subordinated. The Court dismissed the action in its entirety and found in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff on all counts. More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on September 9, 2005
Frenz v. Gencor Indus., Inc., C.A. No. 1204-N, 2005 WL 2266594 (Del. Ch. Sept. 9, 2005).
Plaintiffs sought a temporary injunction barring the 2005 annual shareholder's meeting of Gencor Industries, Inc., or, in the alternative, to amend proxy materials to include a nominee for independent director.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on September 9, 2005
Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. Kall, C.A. No. 526-N, 2005 WL 2266592 (Del. Ch. September 9, 2005).
Plaintiff Rockwell Automation, Inc. filed complaint against Defendant, a former employee of Plaintiff, to obtain documents containing its confidential and proprietary information.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on September 8, 2005
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Advanta Corp., 2005 WL 2234608(D.Del., Sept. 8, 2005).
Plaintiffs filed an action alleging that Defendant Advanta engaged in (1) federal securities fraud in violation of § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j; (2) Delaware securities fraud in violation of 6 Del. C. § 7323(a)(2); (3) common law fraud; (4) negligent misrepresentation; and (5) breach of contract.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on August 30, 2005
Polak v. Kobayashi, No. Civ. A. 05-330 JJF, 2005 WL 2008306 (D.Del. Aug. 22, 2005).
Plaintiff filed a motion to remand a matter involving several Delaware state law claims, alleging lack of subject matter jurisdiction and because complete diversity of citizenship did not exist. Alternatively, plaintiff claimed that the Court should decline to exercise jurisdiction on the
Burford abstention doctrine. Defendant filed a motion to remove the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446 to the District Court for the District of Hawaii. The court denied the motion to remand.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on August 25, 2005
China Three Gorges Project Corp. v. Rotec Industries, Inc., No. Civ. A. 04-1510 JJF, 2005 WL 1813025 (D.Del. Aug. 2, 2005).
This action involves a Petition to Confirm a Foreign Arbitral Award filed by Petitioner China Three Gorges Project Corporation ("China Gorges") and respondent's Motion to Dismiss or in The Alternative, To Modify The Foreign Arbitral Award. The Court granted the petition to confirm the award and denied the respondent's motions.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on August 23, 2005
Lillis v. AT&T Corp., C.A. No. 717-N, 2005 WL 2149748 (Del. Ch. Aug. 23, 2005).
Plaintiffs, former owners of options to purchase shares in AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. ("Wireless"), brought suit against Wireless and AT&T Corp., seeking compensation for the value of their options, which were canceled when Wireless merged with Cingular Wireless Corp. Plaintiffs were officers and directors of MediaOne Group, Inc., a broadband telecommunications company, which AT&T purchased. At MediaOne, plaintiffs were to receive stock options as part of their compensation under the 1994 Stock Plan. After AT&T acquired MediaOne, AT&T exchanged the MediaOne options for new options in AT&T and, subsequently, for options in Wireless.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on August 22, 2005
Haywood v. Ambase Corp., C.A. No. 342-N, 2005 WL 2130614 (Del. Ch. Aug. 22, 2005).
Plaintiffs Haywood and Cronin were beneficial owners of defendant AmBase Corporation's ("AmBase") common stock. Ambase was a publicly held Delaware corporation, and its primary purpose at the time was to pursue pending litigation against the United States government based on the impact of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act. Richard Bianco was the chairman and chief executive officer of AmBase.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on August 19, 2005
Andaloro v. PFPC Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 20289, 2005 WL 2045640 (Del. Ch. Aug. 19, 2005).
Andaloro v. PFPC Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 20336, 2005 WL 2045640 (Del. Ch. Aug. 19, 2005).
This was a consolidated appraisal and equitable fiduciary duty action (the court did not address the fiduciary claim in this opinion). It arose out of a merger in which PFPC Worldwide, Inc. ("PFPC"), was acquired by its parent PFPC Holding Corp. ("Holding"), which held over 98% of PFPC's stock before the merger. (The merger was also approved by PFPC's ultimate parent and Holding's immediate parent, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. ("PNC").) The merger resulted in the elimination of the minority shareholders' position in PFPC for $34.26 per share.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on August 18, 2005
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 2005 WL 2155695 (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 18, 2005).
The Plaintiff filed a notice of partial dismissal in an attempt to dismiss certain defendants. The defendants who were purportedly dismissed moved to quash the notice of dismissal. The court found that one defendant insurer could be dismissed because the entire action was being voluntarily dismissed. However, the court granted the motion to quash as to the other defendant because the dismissal only eliminated certain claims as opposed to the entire action. Plaintiff also sought leave of the court to dismiss a second group of defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2). The court denied this motion.
More ›
Share