By Morris James LLP on May 10, 2006
In re Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc., C.A. No. 1554-N, 2006 WL 1388749 (Del. Ch. May 10, 2006).
Respondent in appraisal action sought two-tier, rather than one-tier, confidentiality order.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on April 26, 2006
Delaware Open MRI Radiology Associates, P.A. v. Kessler, C.A. No. 275-N, 2006 WL 1215096 (Apr. 26, 2006). This case was described by Vice Chancellor Strine as "another progeny of one of our law's hybrid varietals: the combined appraisal and entire fairness action." The court was tasked with determining whether the share price in a squeeze-out merger was fair, and, if not, what the extent of the underpayment to the minority shareholders was. The court found that the merger price was unfair, and finding no difference between the award the petitioners/plaintiffs would receive in appraisal or in equity, the court awarded an amount equivalent to petitioners' pro rata share of the company's appraisal value on the date of the merger. More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on April 12, 2006
Regal Entertainment Group v. Amaranth LLC, C.A. No. 1226-N, 2006 WL 948257 (Del. Ch. Apr. 12, 2006). Plaintiff, Regal Entertainment Group, asked the Court of Chancery to grant its motion for certification of defendant class. Plaintiff is the issuer of a series of convertible notes under an indenture and defendant Amaranth is one of the largest holders of these notes. After a public dispute regarding Regal's method of calculating the number of shares of common stock upon conversion, Regal filed a lawsuit against Amaranth seeking a declaration that its calculation was correct. Amaranth counterclaimed that its calculation of conversion was correct. The only objection that Amaranth raised to the motion for certification was that its status as a hedge fund should relieve it of the obligation to serve as the representative of a defendant class. The court granted Regal's motion for class certification finding that Amaranth is well-positioned to represent the class as it seeks to advance an interpretation of the calculation provisions of the indenture contrary to Regal's, which affects all noteholders. More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on February 10, 2006
Ramunno v. Capano, et al., C.A. No. 18798-NC, 2006 WL 375541 (Del. Ch. Feb. 10, 2006).
This is a fiduciary claim based action to appraise the fair value of real property brought by the trustee of four trusts that held a 12.1% interest in that property held by the defendant entity and its two majority interest holders, after that entity's merger into a new Delaware limited partnership.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on December 20, 2005
Henke v. Trilithic Inc., C.A. No. 13155, 2005 WL 2899677 (Del. Ch. Oct. 28, 2005).
Plaintiff, who was a stockholder of Trilithic, Inc., brought an appraisal action against Defendant Trilithic under 8
Del. C. §262.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on August 19, 2005
Andaloro v. PFPC Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 20289, 2005 WL 2045640 (Del. Ch. Aug. 19, 2005).
Andaloro v. PFPC Worldwide, Inc., C.A. No. 20336, 2005 WL 2045640 (Del. Ch. Aug. 19, 2005).
This was a consolidated appraisal and equitable fiduciary duty action (the court did not address the fiduciary claim in this opinion). It arose out of a merger in which PFPC Worldwide, Inc. ("PFPC"), was acquired by its parent PFPC Holding Corp. ("Holding"), which held over 98% of PFPC's stock before the merger. (The merger was also approved by PFPC's ultimate parent and Holding's immediate parent, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. ("PNC").) The merger resulted in the elimination of the minority shareholders' position in PFPC for $34.26 per share.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on April 25, 2005
Finkelstein v. Liberty Digital, Inc., 2005 WL 1074364 (Del. Ch. April 25, 2005).
This appraisal case involved the fair value of shares of a company, Liberty Digital, Inc., that was merged with an acquisition subsidiary of Liberty Media Corporation and survived the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Liberty Media. What was atypical about this appraisal case was that the parties were able to stipulate to the value of all but one of Liberty Digital's assets.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on March 4, 2005
Gilliland v. Motorola, Inc., 873 A.2d 305 (Del. Ch. 2005).
Plaintiff sought a class-wide "quasi-appraisal" remedy for minority stockholders eliminated in a short-form merger. Statutory appraisal was impractical for two reasons. First, formalistically, the minority stockholders no longer owned shares in the merged subsidiary and without the shares, they could not make the demand required by the appraisal statute. Second, from a practical standpoint, the two-year delay made it impossible to recreate the factual context necessary to have statutory appraisal. Therefore, Vice Chancellor Lamb granted the quasi-appraisal remedy and outlined its procedure.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on February 3, 2005
Encompass Services Holding Corp. v. Prosero Incorp. f/k/a FacilityPro.com Corp., C.A. No. 578-N, 2005 WL 332810 (Del. Ch. Feb. 03, 2005).
This is a 8
Del. C. §262 share appraisal case brought by a "debtor in possession" after the dismissal of its earlier filed adversarial proceeding in the bankruptcy court.
More ›
Share
By Morris James LLP on January 6, 2005
In re United States Cellular Operating Co., C.A. No. 18696-NC, 2005 WL 43994 (Del. Ch. Jan. 06, 2005).
This is a share appraisal action involving cellular phone corporations under 8
Del. C. §262.
More ›
Share